Showing posts with label #freedom. Show all posts
Showing posts with label #freedom. Show all posts

Thursday, January 6

The EU Must Stop Hungarian Net Censorship

Posted by Anonymous On 12:22 AM

we support the blackout 4 hungary.net campaign for a free internet

La Quadrature du Net joins the blackout operation launched by Hungarian civil rights activists who oppose the newly enacted media law. Everybody is invited to join the blackout and contact their representatives to oppose any kind of censorship in the European Union.

This law imposes a stringent regulation of printed, audiovisual and online media which severely undermines the democratic foundations of the Hungarian republic.

Today, La Quadrature also sent a letter to the European Commission and the President of the EU Parliament to ask them to take concrete steps to protect freedom of expression in Hungary.

The music is revolutionary. No one can prohibit hear...

Letter to EU institutions

Dear Mr. Barroso, President of the European Commission,
Dear Mrs. Reding, Vice-President of the European Commission, in charge of Justice and fundamental rights,
Dear Mrs. Kroes, Vice-President of the European Commission, in charge of the Digital Agenda,
Dear Mr. Buzek, President of the European Parliament,

As Hungary takes over the Presidency of the EU Council, we want to add our voice to those of the many civil society and governmental organizations who have denounced the dangerous drift toward a regime of a priori political control of information in this EU country. We ask you to take urgent and concrete steps to oppose it.

As you are aware, Hungary's new media law creates a compulsory registration system for all content providers, including websites. Such a provision directly contravenes the declaration on freedom of communication on the Internet adopted by the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe on May 28th, 2003. The declaration provides that "the active participation of the public, for example by setting up and running individual websites, should not be subject to any licensing or other requirements having a similar effect". What is more, the law creates an administrative authority that will have the power to enforce drastic restrictions on free speech across the whole public sphere. The press as well as websites will be subject to the regulatory power of a political body whose independence is far from effective. This would be a unique situation in the European Union, and in liberal democracies around the world.

Freedom of expression is the cornerstone of democracy. When the benefits of the Internet should hold us clear of unnecessary restrictions on free of speech – especially for private individuals – this law takes us decades backward by creating the structure of a censorship regime. The Internet can help us improve the functioning of our democracies by allowing anybody to engage in democratic deliberation: controlling elected representatives, evaluating the way they exert their duties, coming up with viable political propositions that can be taken into account by democratic institutions, thus legitimising the political power. But if the public sphere is crushed by the control of the State, who can use vague concepts such as "objectivity" to enforce stringent sanctions, then deliberation is hindered and society drifts away from the democratic ideal.

Such a law is not tolerable in the European Union, nor anywhere else for that matter. If it is upheld, the Hungarian Presidency of the EU Council will send a disastrous message to the rest of the world. All EU countries should be held to the highest democratic standards. Even if a comprehensive framework for protecting freedom of expression on the Internet is not yet available at the EU level, the provisions of the Charter of Fundamental Rights and of the Treaties enable you to take immediate action to protect European values. If these values are to mean anything, then you – as guardians and representatives of the Union – cannot just sit back and go on to "business as usual". The Treaty provides a procedure to sanction a Member State that fails to respect its commitment to the universal values embodied by the European project. We ask you not to hesitate to launch the procedure provided by article 7, which can lead to the suspension of that Member State' rights in EU institutions.

Urgent and decisive action is needed now that the law has already come into force. Freedom of expression is the basis of our democratic society, and realpolitik cannot be an excuse for inaction against attacks on democracy, especially when such attacks occur in the Union. We trust that you will adopt the right path of action, and defend the fundamental rights of our fellow EU citizens in Hungary.

Sincerely,

Philippe Aigrain, Gérald Sédrat-Dinet, Benjamin Sonntag et Jérémie Zimmermann, co-founders of La Quadrature du Net.

Via laquadrature.net

Tuesday, January 4

Global Internet Censorship

Posted by Anonymous On 3:44 AM

At the beginning of this year EFF identified a dozen important trends in law, technology and business that we thought would play a significant role in shaping digital rights in 2010, with a promise to revisit our predictions at the end of the year. Now, as 2010 comes to a close, we're going through each of our predictions one by one to see how accurate we were in our trend-spotting. Today, we're looking back on Trend #3, Global Internet Censorship, where we predicted the following:

The music is revolutionary. No one can prohibit hear...

For years, the obvious benefits of an uncensored Internet have kept advocates of Net blocking on the defensive. But new filtering initiatives in Australia and Europe combined with growing rhetoric around child protection, cybersecurity and IP enforcement means that blocking websites isn't just for authoritarian regimes any more.

That's not to say tyrants aren't paying close attention to the West's new censors. When democratic governments complain about Iran and China's net policing in 2010, expect defenses of "we're only doing what everyone else does".

2010 will see the publication of Access Controlled, a new book from the OpenNet Initiative chronicling the globalization of Internet censorship; we're excited to see it but concerned about the ways restrictions in different countries reinforce each other.

Shortly after this prediction, there was some encouraging news: U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton staked out clear a position for the American Government in favor of global online freedom and against Internet censorship. But subsequent developments have been much less encouraging. In fact, as 2010 draws to an end, the United States has veered dangerously towards becoming a significant Internet censor itself.

One push for censorship has come from big media businesses, who are trying to have the government create blacklists to censor the domain name system for copyright enforcement purposes. Officials from the Department of Homeland Security have announced that they believe they don't even need new laws before they begin censoring websites, and they have begun seizing domain names. For defenders of a free and uncensored global network, this is a calamitous development, and we are already seeing reports that DHS is shutting down websites that are helping, not hurting, artists. As is often the case, censorship is hurting those it was intended to protect.

The other push for Internet censorship is a response to Wikileaks. Wikileaks has been subject to an astonishing amount of informal government pressure, which convinced a string of Internet hosting companies to drop the site. These are troubling developments.

As 2010 draws to a close, the United States faces two paths forward. There is the low road, continuing and expanding this new American brand of Internet censorship. And there is a high road: to remember that the First Amendment protects everyone's right to speak, even if the government disapproves of the things they say or the data they publish. If the United States takes the high road, there will still be a difficult and protracted battle to persuade the world's governments that Internet censorship is bad policy. If the United States takes the low road, the battle is already lost.

by Peter Eckersley
Via Electronic Frontier Fundation

Thursday, December 30

Germany expects Hungary to change media law

Posted by Anonymous On 11:58 PM

The German government expects Hungary to make changes to a new media law that would tighten government control over news outlets and has drawn criticism from fellow European Union members.

Deputy Foreign Minister Werner Hoyer told a German newspaper that he hoped Hungary would move quickly to change the law, which is set to take effect on Jan. 1. Hungary takes over the EU's rotating presidency from Belgium on Saturday.

"I assume that the final word by the Hungarian government hasn't been spoken yet on this issue," Hoyer told the Thursday edition of the Frankfurter Rundschau. "It would be very good if this issue could be cleared up quickly."

Hoyer added: "We must ensure that basic rights are guaranteed in the European Union and a free press is among the core rights. If there are doubts they need to be eliminated. Even if I don't know the exact wording of the new law, there are indeed doubts."

Hungary's parliament passed a law last week which tightens government control over news outlets. Media watchdogs say it is arbitrary and ill-defined and several leading European newspapers have issued strong protests against it. [ID:nLDE6BM09M]

Luxembourg Foreign Minister Jean Asselborn has said the law violates the "spirit and letter" of EU treaties and urged the European Commission to take swift action in response.

Hungary's Prime Minister Viktor Orban has vowed to stick with the legislation and attributed the backlash to a lack of understanding of domestic issues in his country.

The new National Media and Communications Authority (NMHH), dominated by people loyal to the ruling Fidesz party, will oversee all public news production and its powers will include levying big fines on private media that violate the law.

Via reuters.com